Construction is one of the most cash-intensive industries in the United States — and one of the most misserved by traditional financing. You spend money months before you collect it, suppliers want payment within 15–30 days, and your bank’s loan approval takes longer than your project start date. A merchant cash advance bridges that gap, but getting one right for a construction business requires understanding how the product actually works for contractors.
Why Construction Cash Flow Is Different
Most businesses have relatively steady daily revenue. Restaurants swipe cards all day. Retailers process transactions continuously. Construction doesn’t work that way.
On a typical commercial project, you might invoice three times: a mobilization payment (10–15%), a progress payment at 50% completion, and a final payment at closeout — less 5–10% retainage held for 30–90 days after punch list. Each payment might take 30–45 days to arrive after invoicing. Meanwhile, your material costs hit on day one and payroll runs every two weeks whether the project is moving or not.
That structure creates a predictable gap: high early outflows, delayed inflows, fixed operating costs throughout. The contractors who grow are the ones who solve this gap cheaply. The ones who struggle are the ones who run out of options mid-project.
How MCAs Work for Construction (ACH-Based, Not Card-Split)
The traditional merchant cash advance was designed for businesses with heavy credit card volume. The funder splits 10–20% of daily card transactions until the advance is repaid. A restaurant or retail store has that. A general contractor collecting wire transfers and ACH payments from project owners does not.
ACH-based MCAs — sometimes called revenue-based MCAs or bank-statement-based advances — solve this. Instead of splitting card swipes, the funder:
- Reviews 3–6 months of business bank statements to assess average monthly deposits
- Sets a fixed daily or weekly ACH withdrawal from your business checking account
- Continues debiting until the total repayment amount is collected
Because repayment comes from the same account that receives all your deposits — regardless of how clients pay you — construction companies qualify on the same terms as any other business. Your check-paying general contractor doesn’t disqualify you.
What It Actually Costs: Three Real Scenarios
| Scenario | Advance | Factor Rate | Total Repayment | Cost | Estimated Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials buyout for $250K project | $75,000 | 1.30 | $97,500 | $22,500 | 7–9 months |
| Payroll bridge (winter slowdown) | $40,000 | 1.35 | $54,000 | $14,000 | 5–7 months |
| Equipment deposit + first-month lease | $25,000 | 1.40 | $35,000 | $10,000 | 4–5 months |
Scenario 1 — Materials buyout: A residential builder lands a $250,000 renovation contract requiring $75,000 in lumber and structural materials within 10 days of project start. Their bank would take 4–6 weeks. They take a $75,000 advance at a 1.30 factor rate — total repayment $97,500, cost $22,500. That’s a fixed daily ACH of about $575 over roughly 170 business days (~8 months). Their margin on the job is $55,000–$70,000. The math works.
Scenario 2 — Payroll bridge: A specialty electrical contractor in a northern state loses 50% of revenue from December through February but carries a crew of 8 to stay competitive in spring. A $40,000 advance at 1.35 covers 6–8 weeks of payroll. Total cost $14,000, repaid through spring as projects ramp up.
Scenario 3 — Equipment deposit: A site contractor needs a $25,000 deposit on a concrete pump rental for a 3-month commercial project. Equipment financing for a rental deposit doesn’t exist — the bank won’t finance something you don’t own. An MCA funds the deposit in 2 business days.
In all three cases, the question isn’t “is this cheap?” It’s “does the funded activity generate more than the advance costs?” If yes, the MCA is a rational tool.
Construction MCA Providers: Compared
| Provider | Advance Range | Factor Rates | Min. Credit | Min. Time in Business | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fora Financial | $5K–$1.5M | 1.18–1.48 | 500+ | 6 months | Fastest for smaller advances; handles newer contractors |
| National Funding | $5K–$500K | 1.10–1.20 | 600+ | 6 months | Competitive rates for established profiles; also offers equipment financing |
| Kapitus | $50K–$5M | 1.10–1.50 | 625+ | 24 months | Best for large advances; slower underwriting but can do $500K+ |
| Libertas Funding | $50K–$5M | 1.05–1.30 | 630+ | 24 months | Strongest factor rates for high-revenue contractors ($75K+/month); transparent terms |
Compare all 24 providers in the directory →
Best fit by situation:
- New contractor (6–18 months): Fora Financial handles lighter time-in-business requirements with factor rates as low as 1.18 for strong profiles.
- Mid-size established contractor ($20K–$80K/month revenue): National Funding offers the most competitive factor rates in the 1.10–1.20 range without requiring 2+ years.
- Large advance ($150K+): Kapitus or Libertas — both handle $500K+ with longer-term underwriting and better rates for strong-revenue construction businesses.
How to Qualify: What Funders Actually Look At
Construction companies are underwritten differently than retail businesses. Funders expect project-based deposit patterns — you don’t need to explain why you had $0 in week 2 followed by $85,000 in week 3. What they look for:
Bank statements (3–6 months):
- Average monthly deposits of $20,000–$25,000+ (some funders go as low as $15,000)
- No more than 5–7 NSF (non-sufficient funds) incidents in the period
- No active bankruptcy or pending judgments
Business documents:
- Active contractor license in your state (required — this is a dealbreaker if expired)
- 1+ year in business as registered entity (12 months minimum; 24+ for larger advances)
- Personal credit 550+ (600+ for competitive rates; 625+ for Kapitus, 630+ for Libertas)
Project context (helpful, not always required):
- Copy of signed contract or letter of intent for the project being funded
- Brief description of the funding need and how it will be repaid
You do not typically need tax returns for advances under $150,000. Funders rely on bank statements and the deposit patterns they reveal.
Red Flags to Watch For
No stated factor rate in the agreement. Legitimate funders put the factor rate, total repayment amount, and holdback percentage in writing. Verbal quotes only, or documents that describe cost as a “fee” or “daily rate” without a clear factor, are a warning sign.
Factor rate above 1.50. The mainstream MCA market caps around 1.49 even for high-risk borrowers. Rates above that are associated with distressed borrowers, stacking situations, or predatory providers.
Fixed daily debits that don’t match your revenue cycle. If you invoice monthly and collect on net-30, a $600/day ACH debit is going to create problems during the first 30 days before your project payments arrive. Ask whether the funder offers weekly debits or a modified payment schedule aligned to your project cycle.
Stacking language. If the advance agreement prohibits you from taking additional financing without permission, you’re locked in. If it requires you to notify existing funders of new advances, that’s standard. Read the cross-default provisions before signing.
Use the MCA cost calculator to model your specific advance amount and factor rate. Compare construction-friendly providers in the directory, or check whether an MCA is the right tool with the 60-second funding quiz.